BRUSSELS, BELGIUM — Grain traders, crushers and compound feed manufacturers gathered on Nov. 12 to discuss ways to mitigate impacts on trade of the ongoing regulatory transition to lower maximum residue levels (MRLs) for pesticides in commodities
During a workshop in Brussels on the Trade Impact of Pesticide Residues, which brought together interested stakeholders across grain commodity supply chains and governmental bodies from the E.U. and worldwide, COCERAL, FEDIOL and FEFAC invited various experts to analyze the problem and discuss solutions to prevent major supply disruptions.
The workshop gave about 130 players in the value chain the opportunity to engage openly and share views on the options that would help manage or mitigate the impact on their activities.
COCERAL, FEDIOL and FEFAC recalled their commitment to ensure food and feed safety, in a context where E.U. society supports lower pesticide use and E.U. authorities are implementing this desire by making the use of plant protection products (PPPs) subject to stricter authorization rules, with a view to strengthen consumer, health and environmental protection.
At the same time, the right of third countries to use a different, risk-based approach for their pesticides’ legislation has been fully recognized. The experts noted that business operators and authorities have to accommodate the fact that there is no immediate prospect of alignment between the E.U. and of the world with regard to the assessment of active substances used in plant protection products, even if this remains highly desirable.
In the absence of such alignment, the experts agreed there is need for sufficient predictability and lead-in time for businesses, allowing the supply chain to continue operating. Workable solutions have to be found in the case where the systematic and near-immediate lowering of existing maximum levels would leave business operators exposed to non-compliance and without any possibility for finding operational solutions for the supply chain.
“We are looking for a form of harmonization of how pesticide MRLs in feed are implemented across Europe to preserve a level playing field, and we consider that it would be helpful to find ways for sharing knowledge and information within the feed chain in particular for risk assessment output for feed products,” said Alexander Döring, secretary general of FEFAC. “In the same spirit, continuing to build knowledge and convergence on the application of processing factors is desirable.”
The expert agreed that efficient farming and integrated food systems need tools for securing quality, safety and volumes of agricultural products, as well as reducing food losses. They noted that this currently seems impossible to achieve without developing alternative practices and less problematic plant protection products.
At a moment when the new E.U. policy approach for plant protection products is being implemented in Europe, ways need to be found to enhance understanding and convergence on how MRLs should be managed for products that are derived from commodities to which MRLs apply, such as feed materials, the experts said.
“Traders in agriculture commodities are constantly striving to meet E.U. demand for food and feed ingredients, and to that end take a variety of measures to help tackle the risk of supply disruption across the different supply chains that rely on imports,” said Illiana Axiotiades, secretary general of COCERAL. “This is particularly the case for high-protein sources, where Europe imports over 70% of its needs. We closely work with the other sectors that rely on imports of proteins and share the same concerns related to MRLs on pesticides in order to ensure their input needs are covered.”