NAWG: Budget proposal could hurt U.S. wheat farmers
March 20, 2017
by Susan Reidy
Search for similar articles by keyword: [NAWG
The budget proposal includes a 21% reduction for the USDA and 31% cut at EPA.
WASHINGTON, D.C. , U.S. – The National Association of Wheat Growers (NAWG) said on March 17 that it is concerned what impact the “deep discretionary cuts” in U.S. President Donald Trump’s first budget proposal will have on U.S. wheat farmers.
“Many of the proposals in the budget blueprint would have an outsized impact on rural America, particularly the possible cuts to agricultural research and to U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) county offices,” said NAWG President David Schemm, a wheat grower from Sharon Springs, Kansas, U.S. “Given the rough economic conditions and perpetual low prices, now is not the time to make such drastic cuts.”
The budget blueprint, which is the President’s recommendation to the U.S. Congress about areas to prioritize funding, includes a reduction from the FY 2017 level of $22.6 billion down to $17.9 billion in discretionary spending, a 21% percent reduction, at the USDA.
NAWG is concerned about what these cuts could mean for wheat research, the functionality of farm programs resulting from cuts to National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) and USDA county offices, rural infrastructure programs, and anti-hunger programs like the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education Program.
The blueprint also contains a 31% cut to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). While NAWG believes the EPA needs to be reined in, NAWG said it wants to ensure that the agency is funded at a level that allows for timely work on registration review of crop protection tools and evaluation of new products. Growers rely on EPA to evaluate the safety of crop protection tools and they need to do so in an efficient and effective manner.
“As the budget process gets under way, we will work with the House and Senate to ensure a common-sense approach to their proposals for FY18 Budget and Appropriations,” said Schemm. “We will also work with the Trump Administration regarding support for important farm safety net programs to ensure they are not subject to mandatory spending cuts or limitations as additional budget details are released this spring. Let’s also remember the $23 billion in deficit reduction over 10 years that was generated by the 2014 Farm Bill. USDA programs generated budget savings and continue to do so, as shown by the recent Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimate that the 2014 Farm Bill actually reduced spending by $100 billion over 10 years.”