NGFA wants rail carriers to report service issues
by World Grain Staff
WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S. — The National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) has urged the U.S. Surface Transportation Board (STB) to require Class I rail carriers to report and make publicly available several specific service-related metrics in the aftermath of the serious disruption in rail service that began in the fall of 2013.
In written statement submitted April 17, the NGFA told the STB of the impacts and costs rail service disruptions have had on grain elevators, grain processors, integrators and exporters. NGFA's comments focused particularly on service-related disruptions involving the BNSF, Norfolk Southern, Canadian Pacific and CSX Railways. The NGFA's statement, which had been summarized and presented orally during an April 10 STB public hearing, was endorsed and supported by six other national agribusiness organizations: Agricultural Retailers Association, Corn Refiners Association, National Chicken Council, National Council for Farmer Cooperatives, National Oilseed Processors Association and North American Millers' Association.
"The sheer gravity, magnitude and scope of rail service disruptions now being experienced are unprecedented, and have rippled through all sectors of grain-based agriculture," testified NGFA Rail Shipper/Receiver Committee Chairman Kevin Thompson, assistant vice-president and transportation lead for Grain and Oilseed Businesses at Cargill Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S. As a result, he pointed out:
• Country elevators and other originators of grain and grain products are extremely hesitant to price and book forward sales from farmers or commercial elevators because they cannot count on predictable rail service or reflect the current level of freight costs in their price bids.
• Grain processors and export elevators have idled or significantly reduced operating capacity because of an inability to predictably source sufficient quantities of grains and oilseeds.
• Millers in the upper and central Midwest are confronting facility shut-downs as they run out of raw commodities to process, including oats and certain classes of wheat.
• Still other grain processing and animal feeding operations, particularly in the Eastern U.S., are shifting to comparatively inefficient and much more costly long-haul truck movements in an attempt to obtain sufficient quantities of grains and oilseeds. Still others are switching rail origination to other carriers in the limited instances where that is possible.
•And for the first time in a long time, the United States' hard-earned reputation as the world's most reliable supplier of grains, oilseeds and grain products to export markets has been put at risk.
The NGFA's statement noted the pressing immediate need to deliver fertilizer prior to planting season in the upper Midwest, with diversion of such shipments to trucks amounting to millions of dollars in additional shipping costs.
In addition, country elevators and other grain facilities that found it necessary to utilize emergency space (ground piles) to store greater-than-normal quantities of grain as a result of the heavy 2013 harvest and permanent storage filled to capacity faced a March 31 deadline for relocating such outside-stored grain to permanent storage.
The NGFA's statement cited specific examples provided by member companies in response to its request concerning the impacts and costs of service-related disruptions, including delays in receiving rail equipment, idling of rail cars on tracks for extended periods while awaiting locomotives, reduced turn-times for shipper-owned equipment, deteriorating basis levels in upper Midwestern plains states and the ballooning costs of obtaining freight in the secondary market at levels amounting to up to $6,000 per car. The NGFA noted that several member companies reported that costs to their individual firms ranged from $10 million to $20 million or more during the October 2013 to March 2014 period.
The NGFA's statement urged the STB to assess carefully the implications on rail carriers' common-carrier obligation to provide reasonable service on reasonable request, particularly if carriers choose to skew their allocation of equipment and service toward products (such as coal, energy and intermodal) in an effort to maximize profits.
The association also said the current level of service-related disruptions warrants heightened monitoring by the STB, as well as the collection and public dissemination by the agency of rail service metrics from Class I rail carriers. Specifically, the NGFA urged the STB to collect and disseminate publicly the following service-related metrics:
1. Real-time information on train velocity and cycle times, as well as realistic projections restoring service.
2. Weekly car loadings by product and state.
3. Weekly average dwell times for trains hauling grain and grain products, coal and crude oil from January 2012 onward.
4. Weekly averages for miles-per-day transited for grain, coal and crude oil since January 2012 going forward.
5. The level of capacity utilization by rail corridors, particularly in the heavy grain corridors of the Pacific Northwest and Texas Gulf. For example, if a Class I carrier's capacity is 40 trains per day within the Pacific Northwest corridor, what percentage of that capacity currently is being utilized and what is the product mix?
6. Real-time data on the number of grain/oilseed, coal and crude oil sets transported by quarter starting in January 2012 and into the future.
7. Breakouts of capital spending by Class I carriers. The NGFA commended rail carriers for investing in their infrastructure, particularly investments that add to capacity to serve growing demand. But is said it would be advisable for carriers to report the share of capital spending being directed to new infrastructure capacity, such as new track, versus replacement of existing infrastructure. The NGFA also recommended that the STB require carriers to report on a quarterly basis net crew and locomotive changes so rail users better can assess these barometers of potential service improvement.